写在文前:本章内容摘取翻译自墙外网友看法,以供人人看法参考和英语学习之用,不代表本团队的态度。

*** 靠山:自休赛期以来,湖人的补强就一直受万众瞩目,对于德罗赞的潜在买卖方案层出不穷,而就在北京时间11月23日,湖人官方宣布球队正式签下更佳第六人蒙特雷斯-哈雷尔,届时,外洋网站Reddit的网友们更先热议。

今日 *** 资料来自@orioncygnus1

Would you rather have Derozan or Harrell if both were on the same contract?

若是德罗赞和哈雷尔拿着一样的条约,你会选谁?

The critici *** s for Derozan & Harrell are similar: poor defense & no 3 point shooting.

对于德罗赞和哈雷尔,外界诟病的都很一致――“防守不咋地还不会投三分。”

But each player has their own strengths. Derozan is a better jump shooter and can somewhat playmake and drive. Harrell is a great offensive rebounder and finisher at the rim, but not a jump shooter.

但两者都有自己的强项。德罗赞有一手跳投绝活,比哈雷尔更能串联球队和撕裂对方的防线。然则哈雷尔的进攻篮板和篮下终结也不赖,惋惜跳投手艺不行。

Harrell has a much better value since demar gets paid over 20mil. If they were on the same contract, who would you rather have?

选哈雷尔显然更好,由于德罗赞的条约都到两千多万了。然则若是他们的条约一样,你又会选谁呢?

以下网友对选德罗赞照样哈雷尔展开了猛烈讨论:

@markay6

Before we signed Schroder, I may have chosen differently. But with Schroder on board, I gotta go with Harrell. Brings more balance to what we need.

我们签下施罗德前,我可能会犹豫一下,但我们都有施罗德了,我一定会选哈雷尔,他会使整个球队更平衡。

@NordicLard

Ok you guys are ridiculous, Derozen for 9m? He’s a much better player than Harrell andit’s frankly not close forget “need” for a while.

你们真的有点扯,德罗赞才值900万?他比哈雷尔好太多了好嘛,坦白说,你们不会遗忘他的显示了吧

@jayhawx86

I picked Harrel because Derozen can't play center. For the makeup of this team, we need a guy like Harrel. Also. i really don't think the margin in talent is as big as you are suggesting. Give Derozen 6th man type minutes, see what his numbers look like.

我的话会选哈雷尔,由于德罗赞打不了中锋。从整个队伍的整体性来说,我们需要像哈雷尔这样的球员。固然,我也不觉得他们俩的先天差距有你说的那么大。让德罗赞打第六人,你看看这点上场时间他能交出什么样的数据。

@kobegoatallday

Against 2nd units though. DeMar plays most of his minutes against starters and averages 20-25, if he’s still playing 25-30 minutes he’d be a better 6th man than Lou Williams easy. Question then is the minutes.

我不赞成后面那句,德罗赞大部分时间对位的都是对方的首发,场均时间在20-25分钟,若是他的上场时间能到25-30分钟,他一定比路威打得好,问题就出在上场时间上。

@Danny_III

Yeah it's 9m. I don't want Derozan on his current contract but for 9m that's huge value

对啊,就900万。德罗赞现在的条约有点难顶,不外900万绝对超值。

@egg-land

Ya I knew people were gonna pick Harrell cuz we just signed him but I didn’t think he would be winning this

我知道是人都市选哈雷尔由于湖人都已经签下他了,但我不觉得他那里能赢过德罗赞

Edit: I assumed this would be when we signed Harrell, if it’srn it’s definitely a lot closer but I would still probably go w demar

我们都签下哈雷尔了,固然是倾向选他,然则若是是之前,效果一定会很靠近,我的话一定是选德罗赞了

@orioncygnus1

hey look, you figured out why i made this poll

你先搞清楚我为什么搞这个投票行不行?

@Leify1989

Why the hell do we want a guy that shoots 20% from 3 and provides no spacing for LeBron or AD to operate?

得脑子抽了,才会选一个三分掷中才20%,还和老詹跟浓眉抢空间的人。

We'd literally be shooting ourselves in the foot, at least Harrell has size and toughness, Derozan can barely defend the perimeter anymore.

那我们就真的是打自己脸了,至少哈雷尔有身体有匹敌,德罗赞现在都防不了外线了。

-------------------------

USDT自动充值

菜包钱包(caibao.it)是使用TRC-20协议的Usdt第三方支付平台。免费提供Usdt钱包支付接口、Usdt自动充值接口、Usdt无需实名寄售回收。菜包Usdt钱包一键生成Usdt钱包、一键调用API接口、一键无实名出售Usdt。

-------------------------

The real question you should ask is "Why wouldn't Trez not win?"

你想问的其实是:“哈雷尔有啥好的?”

@egg-land

Because he is still a hyper efficient 2 point shooter and is would be an elite cutter for this team, he would be great at attacking close outs

为什么?就由于德罗赞依旧是谁人高效率的中投靓仔,能为球队提供火力,能够破包夹联防。

Demar is a significant better player then Harrell and that’s no disrespect to Harrell cuz he’s also a very good player, demar is just better and usually u want the better player in basketball

我不是说哈雷尔欠好,他很好,只是德罗赞比他更好而已,他就是球队都市想要的那种优质球员。

@Leify1989

I get that he's very efficient, but I think you're not seeing the problems that come with Derozan. He can't shoot even a tiny bit. So do you remember what we did to Westbrook in the playoffs? Exactly.

我知道德罗赞很有效率,然则你可能没看到他的问题所在,他的远投真的不行,还记得季后赛我们怎么应对威少的吗,德罗赞也一样。

Teams would have the person guarding Derozan stand near the lake for help defense and let him shoot 3's all day meaning AD and LeBron get double teamed and every other shooter on the team has a player glued to them. Derozan creates more problems for our specific team than what problems he solves scoring wise.

只要劈面一防德罗赞,都知道去放他一步去协防,这样他就只能一直被迫投三分,而浓眉和詹姆斯肯定会被夹击,而其他射手又会有人死死盯着,总之德罗赞带来的问题比他带来的收益要多得多。

@egg-land

Except Westbrook isn’t one of the best mid range shooters in the league

然则威少的中投能跟德罗赞比吗?

If ur gonna sag off him like that and give him open pull up mids he’s gonna make most them, derozen is a better finisher at everywhere outside 3 feet. I agree that some things Harrell does would be more useful then demar doing them but it also helps to have someone that can give u an efficient 30 points an a givin day (say Lebron and/or ad don’t have their offensive games going)

若是你放他一步那就意味着你给了他空间干拔,这可是他善于的器械,德罗赞在3英尺内的终结能力可是有目共睹的。我赞成哈雷尔可以比德罗赞做到更多的事情,然则谁会拒绝一个一晚上能拿30分的高效得分手呢(当詹姆斯和浓眉在进攻端没法开张时)

@orioncygnus1

do you realize that we're comparing derozan and harrell here and that everything you're saying about derozan being a bad fit is even worse with harrell?

你还记得我们是在讨论德罗赞和哈雷尔不?你说的关于德罗赞的一切放在哈雷尔身上是不是更糟?

@Leify1989

Ah no, because Harrel is an actual big man, which is what we need. He rebounds better and he protects the rim.

不不不,哈雷尔正是我们需要的大个子,他篮板能力更佳,还能护框

Oh no, wait. Let's just run out a team where the only C is 35 year old Marc Gasol, yeah that's *** art.

等会,一支中锋只有一个35岁的小加的队伍,选哈雷尔不无道理。

@orioncygnus1

Why the hell do we want a guy that shoots 20% from 3 and provides no spacing for LeBron or AD to operate?

+Derozan can barely defend the perimeter anymore.

=Harrell much gooder

^ your logic

哦,你说德罗赞三分20%+会抢走两巨头的空间+防不了外线=哈雷尔更好,这就是你的“逻辑”是吧?

@kai_123

DeRozan for 9mill? Yeah sure i'll take him at that contract.

900万就拿下德罗赞?我固然会选他了。

@Leify1989

Anyone thinking we should have Derozan is *** oking something.

那些会选德罗赞的怕是都磕嗨了吧。

We need bigs, we need size.

我们要的是大个子,要的是硬黑粗。

We don't need a SG that masquerades at the 3 and 4 who can't shoot more than 20% from deep that crowds the lane for AD and LeBron.

Allbet声明:该文看法仅代表作者自己,与www.allbetgame.us无关。转载请注明:电银付激活码(dianyinzhifu.com):德罗赞和哈雷尔拿一样的条约,你选谁?
发布评论

分享到:

邯郸高铁站:风华秋实携手范丞丞全新音乐之旅马上启程
你是第一个吃螃蟹的人
发表评论

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。